Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adults with ADHD
openNIMH - National Institute of Mental Health
Summary/Abstract
Non-medication options are necessary for the treatment of adult ADHD due to medication’s inconsistent
availability, poor tolerability or palatability for some patients, and limited effects on some meaningful patient
outcomes (e.g., impairment, quality of life; Bellato et al., 2025; Coghill et al., 2017). Cognitive behavioral
therapy (CBT) is the other evidence-based treatment for adult ADHD (Knouse et al., 2017; Ostinelli et al.,
2025) but faces engagement and implementation challenges in real world settings (Gaddis et al., in press;
Staley et al., 2024; William et al., 2024). Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a set of therapist techniques that help
people explore and accomplish behavior change and has been validated in over 500 RCTs (Miller & Rollnick,
2023). MI has been successfully blended with CBT for adolescents with ADHD to improve engagement and
effectiveness outcomes in routine care settings (Sibley et al., 2021a/b). In this study, we propose a randomized
hybrid implementation effectiveness trial that serves as the first evaluation of CBT+MI for adult ADHD (versus
CBT alone) delivered to 216 adults with ADHD by 72 real world independent psychotherapy providers (double
randomization of clients and therapists). The setting of the trial will be the U.S.’s decentralized telepsychology
system and providers will be licensed psychologists with a current PsyPact credential. In year 1 of this trial, we
will conduct a small pilot open trial (N=6 therapists, N=6 clients) with weekly feedback and end-of-trial focus
groups designed to refine remote implementation supports and digitized manual and materials prior to the start
of the trial’s RCT phase in years 2-5. Effectiveness outcomes will be measured at baseline, post-treatment,
and one-year follow-up and include self and informant reports of ADHD symptoms, impairment, comorbid
depression and anxiety symptoms, and quality of life. Target mechanisms will also be measured at these
timepoints and include: (1) executive functioning skills, (2) self-concept, and (3) emotion regulation, which will
be tested as mediators of effectiveness outcomes. Implementation outcomes will follow Proctor et al., (2009)’s
implementation research framework to include multimethod, multidimensional indices of both implementation
and engagement outcomes, which will also be measured as mediators of effectiveness outcomes. We will
examine client and therapist-level treatment moderators as well as mixed method barriers and facilitators of
implementation and engagement (including safety). Cutting edge aspects of this application include a rigorous
differential diagnosis process at intake, leveraging this research team’s previously developed therapy process
coding system (Sibley et al., 2025), intervention co-designed by adults with ADHD, and enriching the sample
with ethnically diverse adults who previously participated in ADHD research as teens and may be treatment
ambivalent, rather than eager. Our application is well-aligned with NIMH’s strategic priority of leveraging
remote implementation supports to improve the reach of mental health services and expediting the adoption of
mental health services by working within existing telehealth infrastructures (NIMH Strategic Framework, 2025).
Up to $896K
health research